Trump officials say US efforts to deter Iran have worked

May 22, 2019 3oliver

Top Trump administration officials worked Tuesday to lower the temperature after weeks of escalating tension with Iran, arguing the decision to deploy U.S. military assets to the Persian Gulf has worked.

“We have deterred attacks based on our reposturing of assets, deterred attacks against American forces,” acting Defense Secretary Patrick ShanahanPatrick Michael ShanahanThe Hill’s Morning Report – White House, Congress: Urgency of now around budget Tensions swirl around Iran as administration to brief Congress Overnight Defense: Iran tensions swirl as officials prepare to brief Congress | Trump threatens war would be ‘end of Iran’ | Graham tells Trump to ‘stand firm’ | Budget talks begin MORE said. “Our biggest focus at this point is to prevent Iranian miscalculation. We do not want the situation to escalate. This is about deterrence, not about war.”

Shanahan was speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill after he, Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoThe Hill’s Morning Report – White House, Congress: Urgency of now around budget Tensions swirl around Iran as administration to brief Congress Overnight Defense: Iran tensions swirl as officials prepare to brief Congress | Trump threatens war would be ‘end of Iran’ | Graham tells Trump to ‘stand firm’ | Budget talks begin MORE and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford briefed the House and the Senate on intelligence that led the administration to deploy additional forces to the Middle East and warn of threats to U.S. personnel emanating from Iran.

While congressional leaders from both parties and some individual lawmakers were previously briefed, Tuesday’s all-members briefings provided the first opportunity for many on Capitol Hill to question the administration on intelligence and policy toward Iran.

And while the Trump administration’s messaging Tuesday appeared designed to assuage concerns, Democrats emerged from the briefings continuing to voice concerns about President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe Hill’s Morning Report – White House, Congress: Urgency of now around budget GOP presses Trump to make a deal on spending Democrats wary of handing Trump a win on infrastructure MORE‘s strategy in the Middle East.

“I worry very much that intentionally or unintentionally we can create a situation in which a war will take place,” Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Memo: Trump faces steep climb to reelection California Democrats face crisis of credibility after lawsuits Fox’s Brit Hume fires back at Trump’s criticism of the channel MORE (I-Vt.), who is running for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, told reporters. “When you do that, you’re talking about a war that will go on and on and on.”

Tuesday’s briefing followed an outcry from lawmakers that the administration had not provided enough information to Congress on its decision to deployment military assets to the Persian Gulf and pull non-emergency personnel from diplomatic missions in Iraq in response to alleged Iranian threats.

Worry about military conflict with Iran spiked after national security adviser John BoltonJohn Robert BoltonTensions swirl around Iran as administration to brief Congress Feehery: A whole new season of ‘Game of Thrones’ Overnight Defense: Iran tensions swirl as officials prepare to brief Congress | Trump threatens war would be ‘end of Iran’ | Graham tells Trump to ‘stand firm’ | Budget talks begin MORE announced earlier this month the accelerated deployment of a carrier strike group to the Middle East as well as a new deployment of a bomber task force in response to unspecified Iranian threats. The State Department then pulled non-emergency personnel from Iraq last week over the threats.

For his part, Trump spent days repeatedly pushing back on reports of disagreement among top aides over his administration’s Iran strategy and said last week he hoped there would not be war with Tehran. On Monday evening, in a change in message, Trump said he had “no indication” Iran will act.

“With Iran, we’ll see what happens. But they’ve been very hostile,” Trump said. “We have no indication that anything has happened or will happen. But if it does, it will be met, obviously, with great force. We’ll have no choice.”

In addition to his comments at the Capitol, Shanahan told reporters at the Pentagon ahead of the briefing Tuesday that any threat from Iran is “on hold” after the arrival of U.S. military assets to the region.

“That doesn’t mean that the threats that we’ve previously identified have gone away,” Shanahan continued. “Our prudent response, I think, has given the Iranians time to recalculate.”

Trump also said Monday that if Iran called, “we would certainly negotiate,” but added that “if they’re not ready, they don’t have to bother.”

But Iran dismissed the idea of talks with the United States, with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani saying Tuesday that “today’s situation is not suitable for talks and our choice is resistance only.”

Still, several Trump allies in Congress insisted that the situation is not headed toward war, an apparent effort to diffuse heated rhetoric.

“I think both sides want to avoid war,” Sen. John CornynJohn CornynGOP presses Trump to make a deal on spending Trump’s immigration push faces Capitol Hill buzzsaw The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Pass USMCA Coalition – Restrictive state abortion laws ignite fiery 2020 debate MORE (R-Texas) said.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellThe Hill’s Morning Report – White House, Congress: Urgency of now around budget GOP presses Trump to make a deal on spending Overnight Health Care — Presented by PCMA — McConnell, Kaine offer bill to raise tobacco buying age to 21 | Measles outbreak spreads to 24 states | Pro-ObamaCare group launches ad blitz to protect Dems MORE (R-Ky.), who was also briefed last week as a member of the so-called Gang of Eight, similarly said ahead of the briefing that there has been no talk of military action.

“Nobody’s talking about a military solution to the current friction with the Iranians,” he said. “I haven’t heard anybody discuss that.”

In the House, the top Republican on the Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Mike McCaul (Texas), also told reporters “there is no intention to go to war in the region.”

Democrats, though, remain concerned the administration is misrepresenting the intelligence to the public.

“I truly believe that the intel has been misinterpreted and misrepresented by Secretary Pompeo, by [national security adviser John] Bolton, and other people that do want us to go to war in Iran, as a repeat to Iraq,” Rep. Ruben GallegoRuben GallegoDemocrats wary of handing Trump a win on infrastructure Tensions swirl around Iran as administration to brief Congress Tensions swirl around Iran as administration to brief Congress MORE (D-Ariz.) told reporters after the briefing.

Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyConnecticut radio station rebrands itself ‘Trump 103.3’ Foreign Relations senators demand Iran briefing Prosecutor appointed by Barr poised to enter Washington firestorm MORE (D-Conn.) said there was debate in the Senate briefing about whether a threat has in fact been put “on hold” as Shanahan claimed.

“It doesn’t seem like we’ve gotten any benefits thus far of the actions we’ve taken,” Murphy said. “The Iranians don’t want to talk to us, and they continue to escalate militarily. So tell me what the point of what we’re doing is.”

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam SmithDavid (Adam) Adam SmithLet’s talk about education and school choice in 2020 Overnight Defense: Lawmakers on edge over Iran tensions | Questions rise after State pulls personnel from Iraq | Senators demand briefing | House panel advances 0B Pentagon spending bill | Warren offers plan on climate threats to military House Dems unveil bill to limit Pentagon’s ability to transfer military construction dollars MORE (D-Wash.) said “we are told that Iran is less threatening as a result of our actions” without getting into specifics, but added that whether the situation is de-escalating a “difficult thing to calculate.”

“There’s a lot going on in a lot of different places,” Smith said, “so I would hesitate to say it’s de-escalated at this point.”