Judge blocks immediate public release of bodycam video in Andrew Brown Jr. shooting, allows family access

A judge has ruled to allow full body camera footage to be disclosed to the family of Andrew Brown Jr., a Black man who was fatally shot by North Carolina sheriff’s deputies last week as they attempted to serve drug-related search and arrest warrants at his home. However, the judge denied a petition by a media coalition to immediately release the video publicly.

Judge Jeffery Foster ordered the Pasquotank County Sheriff’s office to disclose the full video to Brown’s family and an attorney within 10 days, but said any further public release of the video will be delayed for 30-45 days. The judge said he will further evaluate the public release of the videos after an investigation is complete.

All facial and identifying features of the officers would be redacted in the video, the judge ruled. 

The move comes after a prosecutor said in court that Brown’s car made contact with deputies before they fired shots. Brown’s family was in attendance during the hearing Wednesday at the Pasquotank County Courthouse in Elizabeth City. 

The family has seen a short, redacted clip of the body camera video, but it has not previously been released to the public. Under North Carolina law, body camera videos are not public record and they require a court order before they are released. The shooting led to days of protests and calls for transparency from the community, the media and Brown’s family.

Mike Tadych, a lawyer representing a coalition of media outlets, said at the hearing Wednesday the national media interest in the case highlights that there’s a compelling public interest in releasing the video.

Andrew Brown Jr.
Andrew Brown Jr.  Martha McCullen

“The eyes of Elizabeth City, Pasquotank County, North Carolina, our nation and perhaps the world are on us today,” Tadych said. “The [media] petitioners are not here to indict or vindicate law enforcement, and they’re not here to indict or vindicate Mr. Brown. They are here in the interests of advancing transparency in the hopes of aiding the national conversation we find ourselves in about citizens’ interactions with police.”