Utah governor signs bill adding justices to state Supreme Court as redistricting appeal looms

Associated Press

Utah governor signs bill adding justices to state Supreme Court as redistricting appeal looms

HANNAH SCHOENBAUM and MORGAN LEE
3 min read

FILE – Utah Supreme Court Chief Justice Matthew B. Durrant listens to oral arguments for a case challenging the state’s congressional districts before the Utah Supreme Court in Salt Lake City, Tuesday, July 11, 2023. (Leah Hogsten/The Salt Lake Tribune via AP, Pool, File)

(ASSOCIATED PRESS)

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Utah Gov. Spencer Cox signed a bill Saturday that expands the state Supreme Court from five justices to seven as frustration has mounted among Republican lawmakers over a string of defeats before the tribunal.

Republican advocates for the change argued that it would help improve the court’s efficiency. But legal experts said it could have the opposite effect and set a dangerous precedent at a time of tension between the branches of government. The state’s judiciary did not ask for more justices on the high court.

Democrats, who were united in opposition to the bill, called the timing suspicious. Last week the Legislature asked the court to overturn a redistricting ruling that gave Democrats a strong shot at picking up one of Utah’s four Republican-held congressional seats in the fall.

Advertisement

New justices could be in place when the court decides the fate of the congressional map.

Because the bill received approval from more than two-thirds of legislators, it took effect immediately after the governor signed it, allowing him to bypass a several-month waiting period to start adding justices.

In Utah, justices are appointed by the governor and approved by the state Senate. Justices in many other states are elected.

Most states have five or seven Supreme Court justices, but a few have nine. Cox, a Republican, has said the additions would put Utah in line with other states of its size. He has denied that the policy is politically motivated, noting that Republican governors and senators have made all recent appointments.

Advertisement

Once he fills the new seats, Cox will have appointed five of the seven sitting justices.

Last month Republican lawmakers took authority from state Supreme Court justices to select their own chief justice and gave that power to the governor.

“Seven sets of eyes reviewing the most complex and difficult issues our state has ever faced is better than having only five sets of eyes,” said House Majority Leader Casey Snider, a Republican sponsor of the bill.

More in Politics

Why Nobel economist Paul Krugman thinks Trump’s trade war will make Americans ‘measurably poorer’

Business Insider

645

DOJ Removes New Epstein Files That Mention Wild Trump Sex Allegations, Including Rape

Mediaite

3.2K

President Trump reveals plan to build 100,000-seat stadium for UFC White House event

SB Nation

3.4K

John Pearce, who recently retired as associate chief justice, said this month that he doubted the change would make the court more efficient.

“The more sets of comments you have to take into account, the longer the process takes,” Pearce said. “If what the Legislature is hoping to do is speed up the work of the court, it’s going to be counterproductive.”

Advertisement

Two states — Arizona and Georgia — have added justices in the past decade after making similar arguments about efficiency.

In the first few years after Arizona grew its court in 2016, several past and present justices said it made things less efficient because more people had to review opinions before they could be published.

Arizona’s court now issues slightly more rulings per year, while Georgia’s issues slightly fewer than before.

Utah Chief Justice Matthew Durrant told legislators on the opening day of the 2026 session that the court had “essentially no backlog” and urged them to add judges to lower courts, where the need is greater. Bill sponsors responded by adding some lower court judges and clerks.

Advertisement

The Utah State Bar has raised concern over the expansion and other proposals that it said would weaken the judiciary’s independence. Among them is a bill that would create a new trial court with exclusive jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenges. The proposal would limit the ability of other judges and courts to block potentially unconstitutional state laws with injunctions.

Republicans have also been collecting signatures to try to place on the November ballot an initiative that would restore their ability to draw voting districts that deliberately favor a political party, a practice known as gerrymandering.

___

Lee reported from Santa Fe, New Mexico.

A year after losing Luka Dončić, the Mavs have brighter days ahead because of Cooper Flagg
Yahoo Sports
UFC 325 key takeaways: Seriously, Diego Lopes — what was the plan here?
Uncrowned
NFL and ESPN officially close massive deal with government approval; league now owns 10% of network
Yahoo Sports
‘Long live the short kings’: Movsar Evloev, others fighters react to Alexander Volkanovski’s UFC 325 win
Uncrowned
UFC 325 results: Benoit Saint Denis hammers Dan Hooker for fourth straight win
Uncrowned
Tuskegee coach Benjy Taylor ‘at a loss for words’ after being escorted off court in handcuffs
Yahoo Sports
Jarrell Miller’s toupee gets punched off, thrown into crowd in hair-raising scene on Lopez-Stevenson undercard
Uncrowned
Oprah named this flattering jacket a ‘Favorite Thing’ — at just $66, it’s one of ours too
Yahoo Shopping
Swap your sweatshirt for a cozy quarter-zip sweater this winter — we found 7 styles under $50
Yahoo Shopping
Teofimo Lopez vs. Shakur Stevenson live stream online: Re-watch Saturday’s PPV undercard here
Uncrowned

Powered by WPeMatico